I want to work within the parameters of the ruling since my DM runs most rulings as RAW. Is it reasonable to say that if I attack once with a heavy crossbow and once with the hand crossbow, then I use a bonus action to follow up with another hand crossbow attack? I would still use a one-handed weapon with one of my attacks, after all. With the last clause in mind, it says that I can use a bonus action to make one attack with a hand crossbow I am holding as long as I attack with a one-handed weapon. When you use the Attack action and attack with a one handed weapon, you can use a bonus action to attack with a hand crossbow you are holding.
Being within 5 feet of a hostile creature doesn’t impose disadvantage on your ranged attack rolls.You ignore the loading quality of crossbows with which you are proficient.Thanks to extensive practice with the crossbow, you gain the following benefits: The Crossbow Expert feat allows for a lot of fluidity with crossbow combat, but how far could I push it? She'll be entering the Eberron campaign at level 4 as a special operative type of ambusher. Okay, so I'm building a battlemaster fighter that uses both a repeating heavy crossbow and a wrist-mounted hand crossbow actively in combat. Phandelver and Below: The Shattered Obelisk Mordenkainen Presents: Monsters of the Multiverse
